<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spectrum 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2006/12/20/spectrum-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2006/12/20/spectrum-20/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: iwixbpfuon</title>
		<link>http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2006/12/20/spectrum-20/#comment-1867</link>
		<dc:creator>iwixbpfuon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 14:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2006/12/20/spectrum-20/#comment-1867</guid>
		<description>Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! eregqijzgvy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! eregqijzgvy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Peila</title>
		<link>http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2006/12/20/spectrum-20/#comment-434</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Peila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 06:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2006/12/20/spectrum-20/#comment-434</guid>
		<description>What is comes down to is plain and simple.
the subjective reality that being objective when viewing art is impossible.
(or anything else in any case.. ie politics, taste, love, desire, etc)

awesome.

I'm going to get off my ass and get a new blog going, and new work
for all you to laugh your ass off at.
Merry Holidays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is comes down to is plain and simple.<br />
the subjective reality that being objective when viewing art is impossible.<br />
(or anything else in any case.. ie politics, taste, love, desire, etc)</p>
<p>awesome.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to get off my ass and get a new blog going, and new work<br />
for all you to laugh your ass off at.<br />
Merry Holidays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Lavalette</title>
		<link>http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2006/12/20/spectrum-20/#comment-431</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Lavalette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 01:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2006/12/20/spectrum-20/#comment-431</guid>
		<description>Wall's photographs are often referencing other works of art. That is one of the important aspects of his images and, to me, it seems that understanding his allusions simply involves being provided with the &lt;i&gt;information&lt;/i&gt;, and not necessarily the "experience." And again, as Jorn Ake points out on Alec's blog:

&lt;blockquote&gt;...The venture itself, in its attempt to illustrate a fluid (nebulous) state with a static image, resides entirely at the informational end of its own spectrum.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

In other words, the realm of photography is already based on principles of information. There is no escaping this. In a sense, this conclusion makes the Spectrum worthless; it would be hard (if not impossible) to define a truly noninformative photograph. And is experiential really the polar opposite? If informational is realism is experiential a form of abstraction?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wall&#8217;s photographs are often referencing other works of art. That is one of the important aspects of his images and, to me, it seems that understanding his allusions simply involves being provided with the <i>information</i>, and not necessarily the &#8220;experience.&#8221; And again, as Jorn Ake points out on Alec&#8217;s blog:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;The venture itself, in its attempt to illustrate a fluid (nebulous) state with a static image, resides entirely at the informational end of its own spectrum.</p></blockquote>
<p>In other words, the realm of photography is already based on principles of information. There is no escaping this. In a sense, this conclusion makes the Spectrum worthless; it would be hard (if not impossible) to define a truly noninformative photograph. And is experiential really the polar opposite? If informational is realism is experiential a form of abstraction?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Peila</title>
		<link>http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2006/12/20/spectrum-20/#comment-430</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Peila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 22:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2006/12/20/spectrum-20/#comment-430</guid>
		<description>See link above, and I want to hear your reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See link above, and I want to hear your reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Peila</title>
		<link>http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2006/12/20/spectrum-20/#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Peila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 17:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2006/12/20/spectrum-20/#comment-429</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://img530.imageshack.us/my.php?image=graphrs6.png" rel="nofollow"&gt; experiential
Y Axis = conceptual - &#62; formalism

I will think about graphing this, and get you response later." /&#62;&lt;/a&gt;
How bout this. 

X Axis = informational -&#62; experiential
Y Axis = conceptual - &#62; formalism

I will think about graphing this, and get you response later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://img530.imageshack.us/my.php?image=graphrs6.png" rel="nofollow"> experiential<br />
Y Axis = conceptual - &gt; formalism</p>
<p>I will think about graphing this, and get you response later.&#8221; /&gt;</a><br />
How bout this. </p>
<p>X Axis = informational -&gt; experiential<br />
Y Axis = conceptual - &gt; formalism</p>
<p>I will think about graphing this, and get you response later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Lavalette</title>
		<link>http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2006/12/20/spectrum-20/#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Lavalette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 05:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2006/12/20/spectrum-20/#comment-428</guid>
		<description>I was hesitant to use Wall at all in the spectrum of things. But, alas, I have my reasons. Joe, the triangle sounds interesting -- I'd love to see a graph/diagram with photographers plotted in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was hesitant to use Wall at all in the spectrum of things. But, alas, I have my reasons. Joe, the triangle sounds interesting &#8212; I&#8217;d love to see a graph/diagram with photographers plotted in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trevor</title>
		<link>http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2006/12/20/spectrum-20/#comment-427</link>
		<dc:creator>trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 04:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2006/12/20/spectrum-20/#comment-427</guid>
		<description>agreed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agreed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Peila</title>
		<link>http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2006/12/20/spectrum-20/#comment-426</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Peila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 17:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2006/12/20/spectrum-20/#comment-426</guid>
		<description>Acutally, I'm thinking more of a triangle with Conceptual at the top.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Acutally, I&#8217;m thinking more of a triangle with Conceptual at the top.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Peila</title>
		<link>http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2006/12/20/spectrum-20/#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Peila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 17:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2006/12/20/spectrum-20/#comment-425</guid>
		<description>Jeff Wall is a 10, not a 3. His work is not what I would call informational at all. 
It so far experiental in regards to the conceptual aspect of the work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff Wall is a 10, not a 3. His work is not what I would call informational at all.<br />
It so far experiental in regards to the conceptual aspect of the work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2006/12/20/spectrum-20/#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2006/12/20/spectrum-20/#comment-421</guid>
		<description>Shane, you get an 'A' for this assignment. Bravo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shane, you get an &#8216;A&#8217; for this assignment. Bravo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
