<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Objectivity and the Optical Properties of Photographs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2007/07/23/new-objectivity-and-the-optical-properties-of-photographs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2007/07/23/new-objectivity-and-the-optical-properties-of-photographs/</link>
	<description>Photographs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:42:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Peila</title>
		<link>http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2007/07/23/new-objectivity-and-the-optical-properties-of-photographs/#comment-1568</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Peila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 01:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2007/07/23/new-objectivity-and-the-optical-properties-of-photographs/#comment-1568</guid>
		<description>Yeah.. It&#039;s called Formalism. My work has been labeled that, and in a way I think your work falls into that category as well.. as demeaning as it sounds. I know I was offended at first, because I always shoot with a context-concept in mind, but I guess when it comes down to it; it is pretty much about the form in the end, and not the content: unless it&#039;s explained another way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah.. It&#8217;s called Formalism. My work has been labeled that, and in a way I think your work falls into that category as well.. as demeaning as it sounds. I know I was offended at first, because I always shoot with a context-concept in mind, but I guess when it comes down to it; it is pretty much about the form in the end, and not the content: unless it&#8217;s explained another way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Lavalette</title>
		<link>http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2007/07/23/new-objectivity-and-the-optical-properties-of-photographs/#comment-1567</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Lavalette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 21:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2007/07/23/new-objectivity-and-the-optical-properties-of-photographs/#comment-1567</guid>
		<description>Agreed. Yes, and the HDR images remind me of a few of the postcards that have been posted over the last few weeks on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.beikey.net/mrs-deane/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mrs. Deane&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. Yes, and the HDR images remind me of a few of the postcards that have been posted over the last few weeks on <a href="http://www.beikey.net/mrs-deane/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Mrs. Deane</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joerg Colberg</title>
		<link>http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2007/07/23/new-objectivity-and-the-optical-properties-of-photographs/#comment-1566</link>
		<dc:creator>Joerg Colberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 21:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2007/07/23/new-objectivity-and-the-optical-properties-of-photographs/#comment-1566</guid>
		<description>Those HDR photos remind me of those gaudily colourized postcards from around 1900. Not exactly one&#039;s definition of high art (not sure Martin Parr would agree, but we needn&#039;t worry about that). Kitsch will always be that, just kitsch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those HDR photos remind me of those gaudily colourized postcards from around 1900. Not exactly one&#8217;s definition of high art (not sure Martin Parr would agree, but we needn&#8217;t worry about that). Kitsch will always be that, just kitsch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

