<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael Subotzky: Die Vier Hoeke</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2007/10/22/michael-subotzky-die-vier-hoeke/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2007/10/22/michael-subotzky-die-vier-hoeke/</link>
	<description>Photographs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:42:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Lavalette</title>
		<link>http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2007/10/22/michael-subotzky-die-vier-hoeke/#comment-1730</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Lavalette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2007/10/22/michael-subotzky-die-vier-hoeke/#comment-1730</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Doug,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the kind words, and stopping in to read. To answer your question:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I often come across work through some outside source, be it a magazine or simply links on another photographers website to friends or personal inspirations. Generally, though, I don&#039;t have enough time in my day to make so many consecutive (related) posts as I did with the artists you&#039;ve mentioned and the websites just get tossed into my &quot;archive&quot; of &quot;un-discussed&quot; photographers. Citing the original source usually becomes unnecessary when the artists are posted about months apart from one another - not to mention the fact that at that point, I usually can&#039;t even remember where I first found their website. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In this case, however, I probably should have said something about &lt;i&gt;American Photo&lt;/i&gt; or, even, combined them into one post that cited the magazine. And maybe even discussed everyone in the feature? The reason I didn&#039;t is that I&#039;ve already posted about Nicolai Howalt and Trine Sondergaard, I didn&#039;t like the work by Matt Eich, Jehad Nga, Lyric Cabral, Michael Christopher Brown, or Camille Seaman as much as the work that I mentioned (and I love Shen and Amy&#039;s work but I didn&#039;t mention them because they&#039;re photo-friends of mine who are already discussed regularly on the blogosphere). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anyway, I suppose that&#039;s a mistake on my part but I&#039;m glad you picked up on it. I&#039;ll admit, I often think of myself when I&#039;m writing this blog (after all it is a &quot;journal&quot; - I never expected so many readers) and such a thing should be considered.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The only photographer I hadn&#039;t previously heard of (and liked) was Alexandra Catiere. I absolutely love Alexandra&#039;s work. Her &lt;i&gt;Behind the Glass&lt;/i&gt; images make me think of both Harry Callahan&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Heads&lt;/i&gt; and, as mentioned, Andrew Miksys&#039; &lt;i&gt;Buses&lt;/i&gt;. Beautiful.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Again, thanks for taking the time to comment.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Doug,</p>
<p>Thanks for the kind words, and stopping in to read. To answer your question:</p>
<p>I often come across work through some outside source, be it a magazine or simply links on another photographers website to friends or personal inspirations. Generally, though, I don&#8217;t have enough time in my day to make so many consecutive (related) posts as I did with the artists you&#8217;ve mentioned and the websites just get tossed into my &#8220;archive&#8221; of &#8220;un-discussed&#8221; photographers. Citing the original source usually becomes unnecessary when the artists are posted about months apart from one another &#8211; not to mention the fact that at that point, I usually can&#8217;t even remember where I first found their website. </p>
<p>In this case, however, I probably should have said something about <i>American Photo</i> or, even, combined them into one post that cited the magazine. And maybe even discussed everyone in the feature? The reason I didn&#8217;t is that I&#8217;ve already posted about Nicolai Howalt and Trine Sondergaard, I didn&#8217;t like the work by Matt Eich, Jehad Nga, Lyric Cabral, Michael Christopher Brown, or Camille Seaman as much as the work that I mentioned (and I love Shen and Amy&#8217;s work but I didn&#8217;t mention them because they&#8217;re photo-friends of mine who are already discussed regularly on the blogosphere). </p>
<p>Anyway, I suppose that&#8217;s a mistake on my part but I&#8217;m glad you picked up on it. I&#8217;ll admit, I often think of myself when I&#8217;m writing this blog (after all it is a &#8220;journal&#8221; &#8211; I never expected so many readers) and such a thing should be considered.</p>
<p>The only photographer I hadn&#8217;t previously heard of (and liked) was Alexandra Catiere. I absolutely love Alexandra&#8217;s work. Her <i>Behind the Glass</i> images make me think of both Harry Callahan&#8217;s <i>Heads</i> and, as mentioned, Andrew Miksys&#8217; <i>Buses</i>. Beautiful.</p>
<p>Again, thanks for taking the time to comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2007-10-23 &#124; TrentHead.Com</title>
		<link>http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2007/10/22/michael-subotzky-die-vier-hoeke/#comment-1729</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2007-10-23 &#124; TrentHead.Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 14:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2007/10/22/michael-subotzky-die-vier-hoeke/#comment-1729</guid>
		<description>[...] SHANE LAVALETTE / JOURNAL ¬ª Blog Archive ¬ª Michael Subotzky: Die Vier Hoeke If you havenÄôt seen Michael SubotzkyÄôs powerful photographs of South African prisoners, now is the time. (tags: photojournalism) [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SHANE LAVALETTE / JOURNAL ¬ª Blog Archive ¬ª Michael Subotzky: Die Vier Hoeke If you havenÄôt seen Michael SubotzkyÄôs powerful photographs of South African prisoners, now is the time. (tags: photojournalism) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2007/10/22/michael-subotzky-die-vier-hoeke/#comment-1728</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 13:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2007/10/22/michael-subotzky-die-vier-hoeke/#comment-1728</guid>
		<description>Hi Shane -- 

Love your blog, but I have a question about blog etiquette.  Obviously, the last four photographers you&#039;ve featured- Alexandra Catiere, Carlos and Jason Sanchez, Michael Subotzky, Donald Weber--have something in common; they were featured in American Photo.  Curious about the decision to not reference that or cite where you first read information on these photographers?

Best,
Doug</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Shane &#8212; </p>
<p>Love your blog, but I have a question about blog etiquette.  Obviously, the last four photographers you&#8217;ve featured- Alexandra Catiere, Carlos and Jason Sanchez, Michael Subotzky, Donald Weber&#8211;have something in common; they were featured in American Photo.  Curious about the decision to not reference that or cite where you first read information on these photographers?</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Doug</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

