<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Audrey Corregan: Obviously</title>
	<link>http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2008/04/29/audrey-corregan-obviously/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Talbot</title>
		<link>http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2008/04/29/audrey-corregan-obviously/#comment-19981</link>
		<author>Richard Talbot</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2008/04/29/audrey-corregan-obviously/#comment-19981</guid>
		<description>Have both Corregan and Horn ripped off the back-of-bird photos of Australian photographer Lynne Roberts-Goodwin?

If they have, I hope they're at least acknowledging Lynne's work. If not: yucko.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have both Corregan and Horn ripped off the back-of-bird photos of Australian photographer Lynne Roberts-Goodwin?</p>
<p>If they have, I hope they&#8217;re at least acknowledging Lynne&#8217;s work. If not: yucko.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Estel</title>
		<link>http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2008/04/29/audrey-corregan-obviously/#comment-17286</link>
		<author>Estel</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 13:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2008/04/29/audrey-corregan-obviously/#comment-17286</guid>
		<description>It reminds me too the last Andrew Bird Cover Art Album...
What do you think...?
http://www.quemadura.net/p122.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It reminds me too the last Andrew Bird Cover Art Album&#8230;<br />
What do you think&#8230;?<br />
<a href="http://www.quemadura.net/p122.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.quemadura.net/p122.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2008/04/29/audrey-corregan-obviously/#comment-15782</link>
		<author>Julie</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 10:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2008/04/29/audrey-corregan-obviously/#comment-15782</guid>
		<description>It's a shame, Corregan and Horn's works are too similar to be a pure chance. There will be some copyright problems I guess..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a shame, Corregan and Horn&#8217;s works are too similar to be a pure chance. There will be some copyright problems I guess..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2008/04/29/audrey-corregan-obviously/#comment-15781</link>
		<author>Julie</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 10:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2008/04/29/audrey-corregan-obviously/#comment-15781</guid>
		<description>It's a shame, Corregan and Horn's works are too similar to be a pure chance...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a shame, Corregan and Horn&#8217;s works are too similar to be a pure chance&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nina</title>
		<link>http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2008/04/29/audrey-corregan-obviously/#comment-15553</link>
		<author>nina</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 21:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2008/04/29/audrey-corregan-obviously/#comment-15553</guid>
		<description>what about Marjaana Kella's work being very reminiscent of Gerhard Richter's work?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what about Marjaana Kella&#8217;s work being very reminiscent of Gerhard Richter&#8217;s work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Lavalette</title>
		<link>http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2008/04/29/audrey-corregan-obviously/#comment-13199</link>
		<author>Shane Lavalette</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 13:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2008/04/29/audrey-corregan-obviously/#comment-13199</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Indeed they are:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;http://www.steidlville.com/books/699-bird.html&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Good call.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[</p>
<p>Indeed they are:</p>
<p></p>
<p><a href="http://www.steidlville.com/books/699-bird.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.steidlville.com/books/699-bird.html</a></p>
<p></p>
<p>Good call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2008/04/29/audrey-corregan-obviously/#comment-13181</link>
		<author>Daniel</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 12:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.shanelavalette.com/journal/2008/04/29/audrey-corregan-obviously/#comment-13181</guid>
		<description>Is it just me, or are those photographs by Audrey Corregan identical to Roni Horn's "bird" photos?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me, or are those photographs by Audrey Corregan identical to Roni Horn&#8217;s &#8220;bird&#8221; photos?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
